Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Hold Ashok Leyland, says Kunal Bothra

Written By Unknown on Senin, 29 September 2014 | 18.00

Kunal Bothra of LKP Securities advises holding Ashok Leyland.

Kunal Bothra of LKP Securities told CNBC-TV18, " Ashok Leyland is good for some more. The previous high was close to Rs 42-42.50 for Ashok Leyland and looking at the last two days of momentum with the market have picked up and this is one of the few stocks which has picked up. So, if the investor can hold on for a couple of days more then rate of Rs 42.50 or Rs 43 could be possible,"

Ashok Leyland ended at Rs 41.20, up Rs 1.45, or 3.65 percent.

The share touched its 52-week high Rs 42.65 and 52-week low Rs 15.33 on 16 September, 2014 and 26 September, 2013, respectively.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Pearl Polymers: Outcome of AGM

PEARL Polymers Ltd has informed BSE that the 43rd Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Company was held on September 29, 2014.

To read the full report click here


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Riot police withdrawn from protest sites: Hong Kong govt

In a statement, a Hong Kong government spokesman also called on protesters to leave protest areas as peacefully as possible.

The Hong Kong government said on Monday it has withdrawn riot police from city streets after pro-democracy protests began to calm down.

In a statement, a Hong Kong government spokesman also called on protesters to leave protest areas as peacefully as possible.

Hong Kong police used pepper spray, tear gas and baton charges in an attempt to disperse thousands of pro-democracy protesters in the centre of the global financial hub at the weekend.

Protesters are angry at Beijing's plans to vet candidates for Hong Kong's 2017 leadership elections. They want a free choice of candidates when they cast their ballots for the chief executive.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Jayalalithaa moves Karnataka High Court seeking bail

Jaya's lawyers filed two petitions in the High Court. First, for suspension of punishment and the other seeking stay on state government's move to confiscate her properties.

Jailed All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam chief J Jayalalithaa moved Karnataka High Court on Monday seeking bail in the Rs 66.65 crore disproportionate assets case.

Jaya's lawyers filed two petitions in the High Court. First, for suspension of punishment and the other seeking stay on state government's move to confiscate her properties.

Along with her, close aide Sasikala, her relatives V N Sudhakaran and Ilavarasi also approach High Court; seek bail and challenge conviction in the corruption case.

All four were on Saturday convicted by a special court in Bangalore in the 18-year-old corruption case. The former CM has also been fined Rs 100 crore.

While she stepped down as the CM, she also stood disqualified to contest elections for a period of 10 years. Jaya loyalist O Panneerselvam will take oath as the new chief minister of Tamil Nadu on Monday.

The High Court is on Dasara holidays from September 29 to October six and the petition may be taken up tomorrow during a scheduled hearing by a vacation bench. Since the sentencing is for a period more than three years, only the High Court can grant bail in Jayalalithaa's case.
A stay on the conviction would nullify the disqualification of Jayalalithaa as MLA. Unless the conviction is overturned by a superior court, Jayalalithaa runs the risk of being barred from contesting elections for 10 years -- four years when she is in jail and six years after release.
Jayalalithaa is presently lodged in the Parappana Agrahara central jail in Bangalore, as also three others.

(With inputs from PTI)


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Kyoorius Design Yatra focuses on communications business

Written By Unknown on Minggu, 28 September 2014 | 18.01

This week, Storyboard Kyoorius Design Yatra has lined up two interviews that shed light on where the communications business is headed. First is Mat Heinl from British agency Moving Brands. Another is, Natasha Jen, Partner at Pentagram. explains their agency's culture and how they help marketers.

This week, Storyboard Kyoorius Design Yatra has lined up two interviews that shed light on where the communications business is headed. First is Mat Heinl from British agency Moving Brands. Another is, Natasha Jen, Partner at Pentagram. They explain their agency's culture and how they help marketers.


18.01 | 0 komentar | Read More

How Bill Gross became too hot for Pimco to handle

Bill Gross' abrupt departure from Pimco, the giant bond firm that he co-founded more than four decades ago, was preceded by months of clashes between the star investor and the firm's executive committee that got progressively worse, according to sources familiar with the situation.

Tensions had been building within Pimco, the Newport Beach, California-based asset manager with about USD 2 trillion under management. Co-Chief Investment Officer Mohamed El-Erian, Gross's long-time heir-apparent, made an acrimonious exit in January. The flagship Total Return Fund, the world's largest bond fund, suffered 16 straight months of outflows. The wrangling and the underperformance grated on the executive committee, chaired by Chief Executive Douglas Hodge.

"While we are grateful for everything Bill contributed to building our firm and delivering value to Pimco's clients, over the course of this year it became increasingly clear that the firm's leadership and Bill have fundamental differences about how to take Pimco forward," Hodge said in a statement on Friday.

As Gross, known as the "Bond King" within the industry, butted heads with colleagues, the clashes got worse. In recent days, about five senior portfolio managers told the executive committee that they would quit if Gross stayed, the sources said.

Gross himself threatened repeatedly to quit, letting management know that he had been looking around for a role elsewhere. Jeffrey Gundlach of DoubleLine Capital, Gross' arch-rival and the closest contender for the Bond King crown, said in an interview on Friday that Gross approached him early last week about a possible role.

They met last week at Gundlach's house in Los Angeles. The two discussed the possibility of Gross joining DoubleLine, but Gundlach said he wasn't willing to share direction of the firm with Gross.

"He didn't seem that rattled. But he didn't seem happy. He seemed a bit angry about what was going on," Gundlach said.

In recent days, when Gross again threatened to quit, the executive committee decided it was time he actually left the firm, one of the sources said.

The firm had already put a succession plan in place, choosing Deputy Chief Investment Officer Dan Ivascyn as the successor. Allianz SE, the firm's German parent, had given its blessing. An announcement of Gross' ouster had been prepared, and was set to be announced as soon as Saturday, the source said.

Then, Gross sprung a surprise.

On Friday morning, Gross quit Pimco to join asset manager Janus Capital Group, run by his former Pimco colleague Richard Weil. Gross will manage the Janus Global Unconstrained Bond Fund. The fund, started in May, has just $13 million in assets. Pimco Total Return Fund has about $222 billion.

"It is the right thing," Gundlach said of Gross's move to Janus. "Now he can perform better because he isn't managing a lot of money."

Gundlach said Gross left him a voice mail on Thursday evening, saying he was leaving Pimco to join another firm.

Gross didn't respond to requests for comment.

GROSS WALKS AWAY

Gross' abrupt departure climaxes a drama that has riveted industry executives, investors and rivals over the past year. It raises questions about the future performance of the firm, which counts tens of thousands of ordinary Americans and major institutions including the CalPERS pension fund as investors in its mutual funds , exchange-traded funds and other products.

U.S. Treasuries prices fell on Friday, Allianz slipped more than 6 percent in German trading and Janus soared 43 percent.

"I think people are concerned that Pimco is going to have to liquidate, so there is some pre-selling going on ahead of the fact that they may have to do some selling," said Tom di Galoma, head of rates and credit trading at ED&F Man Capital Markets.

Pimco has been stressing in meetings with its investors that the company had several people who could succeed Gross and that he would be playing a smaller role in the firm's investment and management decisions in the future, said Karissa McDonough, a fixed income strategist at People's United Wealth Management in Burlington, Vermont, who met with Pimco representatives in early September.

"They were trying to reassure us by driving home the point that they're not so dependent on Bill Gross anymore," she said.

Gross walks away without severance pay. There are none of the usual contractual obligations in his departure either, the source said. There is no non-compete agreement nor a "gardening leave" cooling off period before he can start to work at Janus, the source said. He starts working at Janus on Monday.

It couldn't be learned whether Gross owns a stake in Pimco. Forbes estimates his net worth at $2.3 billion.

TROUBLE IN NEWPORT BEACH

The first signs of real trouble at Pimco came in January, when El-Erian left the firm and the acrimony spilled out into the open.

On Feb. 24, the Wall Street Journal published a report describing how El-Erian's previously close relationship with Gross had soured as the firm's investment performance deteriorated last year. Then Gross told Reuters that his one-time lieutenant was trying to "undermine" him, and that he had "evidence" El-Erian "wrote" the Journal article.

After El-Erian's exit, Pimco promoted six portfolio managers, including Ivascyn, to deputy chief investment officer roles and revamped the investment committee, positioning them as possible successors to Gross.

But the new structure failed to stem a steady exit of investors from the Total Return Fund, which until today was managed by Gross. Cash outflows began last year due to weak returns and the fund declined 1.9 percent in 2013, its worst performance in nearly two decades. El-Erian's exit exacerbated investors' unease.

Earlier this week, Pimco said the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating whether it inflated the returns of its Total Return Exchange-Traded Fund, also managed by Gross.

The sources said the SEC investigation, which is also into how securities were allocated between the mutual fund and the ETF and has been going on for at least a year, was not the trigger for Gross' departure.

FLARE-UPS

As the problems mounted at Pimco, Gross, already known for an authoritarian management style, had flare-ups with other employees, including Hodge, several sources with first-hand knowledge of such incidents said.

At the same time, he made waves in public with unusual comments and behavior.

In April, he dedicated the first half of his widely followed Investment Outlook letter to his dead cat and headlined it "Bob". "Aside from sleeping, Bob loved nothing more than to follow me from room to room making sure I was OK," he wrote. "It got to be a little much at times, especially when entering and exiting the shower."

At an investment conference in Chicago this summer, Gross donned sunglasses inside the venue and joked he'd become "a 70-year-old version of Justin Bieber."

But there were few signs that his standing within the firm was rapidly fraying.

A few days after the Chicago event, Hodge spoke reverentially about Gross. "Through the Total Return Fund and other strategies, Bill has created more value for more investors than anyone in the history of our industry," Hodge said.

Some industry sources speculated on Friday that Gross' departure may pave the way for the return of El-Erian, who has been working part time as Allianz' chief economic adviser, to the firm.

In an interview on Monday, El-Erian declined to say whether he had any such plans.

"If you ask me for the next six months, I have absolutely nothing in addition to what I am doing," El-Erian said.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Indians, Americans see each other in positive light: Survey

In India, a majority of the public (55 percent) has a favourable view of the US, including 30 per cent with a very positive outlook, according to the survey. Only 16 percent see the US unfavourably, while 29 percent offer no opinion.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the US comes at a time when people of both countries continue to see each other in a largely positive light, according to a Pew Reasearch Centre survey. While Madison Square Garden's sold-out shows usually include headliners like Bruce Springsteen, Madonna or Arcade Fire, tomorrow's reception for Modi is expected to draw an equally massive crowd of nearly 20,000 Indian-Americans, it said.

Modi's appearance at the midtown Manhattan entertainment venue is part of his first trip to the US as leader of the world's largest democracy and comes at a time when people of both countries continue to see each other in a largely positive light, the survey said. In India, a majority of the public (55 percent) has a favourable view of the US, including 30 per cent with a very positive outlook, according to the survey. Only 16 percent see the US unfavourably, while 29 percent offer no opinion. These high ratings are essentially unchanged from late last year, when 56 of the Indian public gave the US positive marks. Americans return the positive feelings, with a majority (55 percent) expressing a favourable assessment of India.

This shows little change compared with the last time Americans were asked to rate India in 2009, when 56% saw the emerging Asian power favourably. As with Indians' views of the US, Americans' regard for India differs by gender, income and education. Men (60 percent) and those who are better educated (59 percent) are more likely than women (51 percent) and those with less education (50 percent) to have a favourable view of
India.

Higher income Americans (63 per cent) also see India more positively, though about half with lower incomes (51 per cent) share this sentiment. The support that Indians and Americans voice for one another may reflect the ever-increasing importance of the Indian diaspora in the US and its involvement in American politics. The Indian-American population now totals over 3 million people, most of whom are highly educated and earn above the median US household income, according to a 2012 Pew Research Centre report on the growing number of Asian Americans. Nearly nine-in-ten adult Indian Americans report being foreign-born, and roughly seven-in-ten (69 percent) have close family still in India. Of those with family remaining in India, about half (49 percent) still send money back on a regular basis.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Kingfisher secures stay against UBI's wilful defaulter tag

KFA and its erstwhile directors had filed a writ in Calcutta HC against UBI and others, challenging the constitutional validity of the RBI master circular on wilful defaulters as well as the ex-parte decision of UBI's grievance redressal committee.

Kingfisher Airlines  announced that it has secured a stay from Calcutta High Court on the decision of the grievance redressal committee of the  United Bank of India which had earlier declared the airline and its directors as wilful defaulters.

UBI has been directed to file its affidavit-in-opposition by November 3 and the petitioners have been asked to file their reply one week thereafter. The next date of hearing is November 10, 2014.

Commenting on the stay granted by the court, Prakash Mirpuri, Vice President-Corporate Communications, Kingfisher Airlines, said: "We had earlier stated that we would legally challenge the wrongful decision of United Bank of India and that we have great faith in the judiciary in our country. We will legally defend our position on all allegations going forward." 

Kingfisher Airlines along with its erstwhile directors had filed a writ petition in Calcutta High Court against UBI and others, challenging the constitutional validity of the RBI master circular on wilful defaulters as well as challenging the ex-parte decision of UBI's grievance redressal committee.

The matter was listed for hearing on Friday (September 26) before Justice Debangsu Basak. After hearing counsel for the petitioners and the bank, Justice Basak passed an order in which he held that, prima facie, the bank acted in breach of the principles of natural justice by not making over the documents referred to and relied upon by it to KFA prior to the hearing. Thus, not enabling KFA to make an effective representation against the charges/allegations made against them in relation to being declared wilful defaulters.

Kingfisher Air stock price

On September 26, 2014, Kingfisher Airlines closed at Rs 1.87, up Rs 0.06, or 3.31 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 6.84 and the 52-week low was Rs 1.72.


The latest book value of the company is Rs -166.59 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company was -0.01.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

PM Modi 'ring fenced' against summons

Written By Unknown on Sabtu, 27 September 2014 | 18.00

Even the White House downplayed the issue, with its Press Secretary Josh Earnest saying that it (lawsuit) was not going to have any impact on Prime Minister Modi's very important visit .

India made it very clear that Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who arrived to the US on a five-day visit, was "ring fenced" and there was no question of anyone serving any summons on him and that an action in the matter was underway. India's strong reaction came a day after a federal US court issued summons against Modi on his alleged role in 2002 communal violence in Gujarat when he was the state chief minister.

Even the White House downplayed the issue, with its Press Secretary Josh Earnest saying that it (lawsuit) was not going to have any impact on Prime Minister Modi's very important visit and added that sitting heads of government also enjoy personal inviolability while in the US, which means they cannot be personally handed or delivered papers to begin the process of a lawsuit. Asked about the summons, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin said, "Indian representative is ring fenced. There is no question of anyone serving any summons on India's sovereign representative. Lets make it very clear, there will be no such issues. State Department has also clarified."

He said the government will handle the process in accordance with the procedure and an action was underway on that. The summons against Modi were issued by US Federal Court for the Southern District of New York following a lawsuit filed by the New York-based American Justice Center (AJC), a non-profit human rights organization, along with two "unnamed" survivors of the 2002 Gujarat violence.

Earlier, the spokesperson had termed the case as a "frivolous and malicious attempt to distract attention from the visit of the Prime Minister to the United Nations General Assembly and a bilateral summit with the president of the United States. "The Indian-American community in the US is also eagerly looking forward to the Prime Minister's visit and has prepared a rousing reception for him.

"The allegations in the case are baseless and similar to other such allegations made in the past against the Prime Minister. A Supreme Court of India-monitored investigation has comprehensively examined and dismissed these allegations as baseless," he said. "It is unfortunate that vested interests are raking up the matter only to vitiate the atmosphere during the visit. Appropriate steps are being taken to address the matter," he added.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Rageen Duniya! Which paint stocks to buy ahead of Diwali

SLIDESHOW

Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 15:49

| Source: Moneycontrol.com

Copyright © e-Eighteen.com Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction of news articles, photos, videos or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of moneycontrol.com is prohibited.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Kyoorius Design Yatra focuses on communications business

This week, Storyboard Kyoorius Design Yatra has lined up two interviews that shed light on where the communications business is headed. First is Mat Heinl from British agency Moving Brands. Another is, Natasha Jen, Partner at Pentagram. explains their agency's culture and how they help marketers.

This week, Storyboard Kyoorius Design Yatra has lined up two interviews that shed light on where the communications business is headed. First is Mat Heinl from British agency Moving Brands. Another is, Natasha Jen, Partner at Pentagram. They explain their agency's culture and how they help marketers.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

How Bill Gross became too hot for Pimco to handle

Bill Gross' abrupt departure from Pimco, the giant bond firm that he co-founded more than four decades ago, was preceded by months of clashes between the star investor and the firm's executive committee that got progressively worse, according to sources familiar with the situation.

Tensions had been building within Pimco, the Newport Beach, California-based asset manager with about USD 2 trillion under management. Co-Chief Investment Officer Mohamed El-Erian, Gross's long-time heir-apparent, made an acrimonious exit in January. The flagship Total Return Fund, the world's largest bond fund, suffered 16 straight months of outflows. The wrangling and the underperformance grated on the executive committee, chaired by Chief Executive Douglas Hodge.

"While we are grateful for everything Bill contributed to building our firm and delivering value to Pimco's clients, over the course of this year it became increasingly clear that the firm's leadership and Bill have fundamental differences about how to take Pimco forward," Hodge said in a statement on Friday.

As Gross, known as the "Bond King" within the industry, butted heads with colleagues, the clashes got worse. In recent days, about five senior portfolio managers told the executive committee that they would quit if Gross stayed, the sources said.

Gross himself threatened repeatedly to quit, letting management know that he had been looking around for a role elsewhere. Jeffrey Gundlach of DoubleLine Capital, Gross' arch-rival and the closest contender for the Bond King crown, said in an interview on Friday that Gross approached him early last week about a possible role.

They met last week at Gundlach's house in Los Angeles. The two discussed the possibility of Gross joining DoubleLine, but Gundlach said he wasn't willing to share direction of the firm with Gross.

"He didn't seem that rattled. But he didn't seem happy. He seemed a bit angry about what was going on," Gundlach said.

In recent days, when Gross again threatened to quit, the executive committee decided it was time he actually left the firm, one of the sources said.

The firm had already put a succession plan in place, choosing Deputy Chief Investment Officer Dan Ivascyn as the successor. Allianz SE, the firm's German parent, had given its blessing. An announcement of Gross' ouster had been prepared, and was set to be announced as soon as Saturday, the source said.

Then, Gross sprung a surprise.

On Friday morning, Gross quit Pimco to join asset manager Janus Capital Group, run by his former Pimco colleague Richard Weil. Gross will manage the Janus Global Unconstrained Bond Fund. The fund, started in May, has just $13 million in assets. Pimco Total Return Fund has about $222 billion.

"It is the right thing," Gundlach said of Gross's move to Janus. "Now he can perform better because he isn't managing a lot of money."

Gundlach said Gross left him a voice mail on Thursday evening, saying he was leaving Pimco to join another firm.

Gross didn't respond to requests for comment.

GROSS WALKS AWAY

Gross' abrupt departure climaxes a drama that has riveted industry executives, investors and rivals over the past year. It raises questions about the future performance of the firm, which counts tens of thousands of ordinary Americans and major institutions including the CalPERS pension fund as investors in its mutual funds , exchange-traded funds and other products.

U.S. Treasuries prices fell on Friday, Allianz slipped more than 6 percent in German trading and Janus soared 43 percent.

"I think people are concerned that Pimco is going to have to liquidate, so there is some pre-selling going on ahead of the fact that they may have to do some selling," said Tom di Galoma, head of rates and credit trading at ED&F Man Capital Markets.

Pimco has been stressing in meetings with its investors that the company had several people who could succeed Gross and that he would be playing a smaller role in the firm's investment and management decisions in the future, said Karissa McDonough, a fixed income strategist at People's United Wealth Management in Burlington, Vermont, who met with Pimco representatives in early September.

"They were trying to reassure us by driving home the point that they're not so dependent on Bill Gross anymore," she said.

Gross walks away without severance pay. There are none of the usual contractual obligations in his departure either, the source said. There is no non-compete agreement nor a "gardening leave" cooling off period before he can start to work at Janus, the source said. He starts working at Janus on Monday.

It couldn't be learned whether Gross owns a stake in Pimco. Forbes estimates his net worth at $2.3 billion.

TROUBLE IN NEWPORT BEACH

The first signs of real trouble at Pimco came in January, when El-Erian left the firm and the acrimony spilled out into the open.

On Feb. 24, the Wall Street Journal published a report describing how El-Erian's previously close relationship with Gross had soured as the firm's investment performance deteriorated last year. Then Gross told Reuters that his one-time lieutenant was trying to "undermine" him, and that he had "evidence" El-Erian "wrote" the Journal article.

After El-Erian's exit, Pimco promoted six portfolio managers, including Ivascyn, to deputy chief investment officer roles and revamped the investment committee, positioning them as possible successors to Gross.

But the new structure failed to stem a steady exit of investors from the Total Return Fund, which until today was managed by Gross. Cash outflows began last year due to weak returns and the fund declined 1.9 percent in 2013, its worst performance in nearly two decades. El-Erian's exit exacerbated investors' unease.

Earlier this week, Pimco said the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating whether it inflated the returns of its Total Return Exchange-Traded Fund, also managed by Gross.

The sources said the SEC investigation, which is also into how securities were allocated between the mutual fund and the ETF and has been going on for at least a year, was not the trigger for Gross' departure.

FLARE-UPS

As the problems mounted at Pimco, Gross, already known for an authoritarian management style, had flare-ups with other employees, including Hodge, several sources with first-hand knowledge of such incidents said.

At the same time, he made waves in public with unusual comments and behavior.

In April, he dedicated the first half of his widely followed Investment Outlook letter to his dead cat and headlined it "Bob". "Aside from sleeping, Bob loved nothing more than to follow me from room to room making sure I was OK," he wrote. "It got to be a little much at times, especially when entering and exiting the shower."

At an investment conference in Chicago this summer, Gross donned sunglasses inside the venue and joked he'd become "a 70-year-old version of Justin Bieber."

But there were few signs that his standing within the firm was rapidly fraying.

A few days after the Chicago event, Hodge spoke reverentially about Gross. "Through the Total Return Fund and other strategies, Bill has created more value for more investors than anyone in the history of our industry," Hodge said.

Some industry sources speculated on Friday that Gross' departure may pave the way for the return of El-Erian, who has been working part time as Allianz' chief economic adviser, to the firm.

In an interview on Monday, El-Erian declined to say whether he had any such plans.

"If you ask me for the next six months, I have absolutely nothing in addition to what I am doing," El-Erian said.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

IRDA to make suggestions on Insurance Bill

Written By Unknown on Jumat, 26 September 2014 | 18.00

IRDA Chairman T S Vijayan said some of the major suggestions are related to areas like health insurance, repositories and e-commerce.

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority (IRDA) would make suggestions vis-à-vis the proposed insurance bill to cover different areas like health insurance and e-commerce, IRDA Chairman T S Vijayan said here today.

"We have a number of suggestions and would be placing them before the Select Committee (Parliament). The bill was envisaged somewhere in 2006, and lot of changes have happened in environment since then. When we are bringing the 2014 bill.. what the IRDA opinion is, it is better that latest changes in technology, is also coming into the bill," Vijayan said.

He was speaking to reporters on the sidelines of a conference organised by industry body Assocham on 'Digitisation and Enhanced FDI in Insurance - The Road Ahead'. The insurance bill, brought afresh by the NDA government in the recent session of Parliament could not be passed and was referred to the Select committee.

Replying to a query, Vijayan said some of the major suggestions are related to areas like health insurance, repositories and e-commerce.

"Some of the suggestions are in relation to life, non-life and health, which was not there in the one proposed in 2006. Health companies have started working and now we have experience in the health sphere, e-commerce has come. Some of the things have to find place in the bill itself," he said.

The IRDA is in favour of capital infusion in the insurance sector so that it can be strengthened, Vijayan said. "What we have been consistently maintaining and is a fact also, is that industry needs capital. If foreign capital is increased, it will be easier flow of capital... We are not saying FDI has to come," he said.

Asked about the level of capital inflows that would be required in the insurance sector, Vijayan said there were various estimates ranging from Rs 50,000 crore and upwards.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Verdict in graft case against Jayalalithaa tomorrow

After fighting an 18-year-old legal battle, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa has a date with destiny tomorrow when a Special Court here pronounces the verdict in the disproportionate assets case against her and three other accused.

Jayalalithaa has been charged with accumulating Rs 66 crore wealth disproportionate to known sources of her income from 1991-96 in her first term as Chief Minister in the case that has seen many political and legal twists and turns.

Her close aide Sasikala Natarajan, her niece Ilavarasi and her nephew and Jayalalithaa's disowned foster son Sudhakaran are others listed as accused in the case.The verdict will be delivered by Special Judge John Michael D'Cunha at a makeshit court in the Parappana Agrahara prison complex with the area in and around turned into a fortress with five layers of security.

Platoons of Karnataka State Reserve Police, the city Armed Reserve and the Rapid Action Force will be stationed near the court, besides hundreds of police personnel, including those in plain clothes, police said.

Keeping all options open, an exclusive helipad has also been built within the prison complex in case Jayalalithaa, who enjoys 'Z Plus' security cover, decides to fly down there, police said.

The Rs 66.65 crore assets case dates back to Jayalalithaa's first term as the Chief Minister, from 1991 to 1996. It was filed before a special court in Chennai in 1996 by the Tamil Nadu's Department of Vigilance and Anti Corruption (DVAC).

In perhaps one of the longest legal battles involving a political leader ever since the case was filed, the country has witnessed five Lok Sabha elections and Tamil Nadu three Assembly polls.

As the case moved, it has faced several twists and turns following the filing of associated cases and petitions. Moreover, the Special Court itself has witnessed five judges presiding over the case - A S  chapure, A T Munoli, B

M Mallikarjunaiah, M S Balakrishna and John Michael D'Cunha.

Controversy also swirled around the case after Karnataka Advocate General B V Acharya quit as Special Public Prosecutor and Bhavani Singh came in his place. Questions were raised in the Supreme Court over appointment of Singh also.

The case was transferred to the Bangalore Special Court by the Supreme Court in 2003 on a plea by DMK, which claimed a fair trial cannot be held in Chennai as the Jayalalithaa-led AIADMK government was in power.

The verdict, which was scheduled for September 20, was deferred to September 27 as the Karnataka High Court had to issue a notification regarding shifting of the court to facilitate Bangalore police to make security arrangements for the Chief Minister.

Jayalalithaa on September 15 had filed a petition before the Special Court judge seeking security cover. The court has directed Jayalalithaa and three other accused to be present before it.

Appearing before the court four times, Jayalalithaa has answered 1,339 questions in closed door hearings during which she has maintained that the case was "politically motivated" and "fabricated" at the instance of her rival DMK.

The case was filed by Subramanian Swamy in 1996 accusing Jayalalithaa of amassing properties worth Rs 66 crore during her tenure as the Chief Minister from 1991 to 1996. She was arrested and jailed for some days after DMK came to power in the 1996 Tamil Nadu Assembly polls.

The case was shifted to Bangalore on a plea by DMK leader K Anbazhagan contending that a fair trial in Tamil Nadu was not possible under Jayalalithaa as the Chief Minister and that many witnesses had turned hostile.

Jayalalithaa, who has waged many legal battles and seen many ups and downs in her political career, had to quit as the Chief Minister immediately after her swearing in 2001 following the Supreme Court declaring null and void the action The Karnataka government has so far spent Rs 2.86 crore on playing host to the case, according to documents obtained by an RTI activist.

On the security issues that may crop up soon after the verdict, senior police officials of the two states had met recently to discuss matters relating to Jayalalithaa's protection and threat perceptions.

The makeshift location where the verdict will be pronounced is a small place and there will be strict access- control and journalists will be kept at a distance, police said.

Police also said that their officials have been told to maintain normalcy across the state, particularly those in districts bordering Karnataka.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Coal verdict out, clamour to allow commercial mining grows

Moneycontrol Bureau

In the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision to cancel all but four of coal blocks allocated to companies over the past nearly 20 years, experts have highlighted it as an opportunity to open up the nationalized coal sector, a move that is expected to spur production in a country starved of the mineral.

The coal sector in India was nationalized in the 1970s following reports of law violations by private miners and blocks were handed over to state-run Coal India .

However, the behemoth has failed to increase its production commensurate with the burgeoning demand for coal, which powers about two-thirds of the country's power plants.

As a result, despite sitting on the world's fifth-largest coal reserves, India had to import a fifth of its total coal requirement.

Experts attribute this to lack of investment in technology and say if private companies, especially international giants such as Australia's BHP Billiton or Rio Tinto, are allowed to enter the sector, it would allow for more efficient exploitation of resources.

For instance, more than half of Coal India's 429 mines are of the underground type -- which are technically more difficult to operate than open-cast mines -- but they produced less than 10 percent of its FY14 output of 462 million tonne.

It was for this lack of production growth that led the government in 1992 to decide to hand over 218 coal blocks to private and state-run companies that were into the power, steel and aluminium sectors, virtually for free. The caveat was that they could use the coal mined only for their production purposes and not sell it in the open market.

It was this decision, which the Supreme Court has now adjudged illegal owing to the discretionary manner in which blocks were handed out. It is now expected that the new government will likely auction blocks after they are taken over from current operators at the end of the fiscal year.

But a whole host of experts have said the government can use this to open up the sector for private mining.

This includes Arundhati Bhattacharya , chairperson of State Bank of India, which currently has an exposure to about Rs 30,000 crore to companies affected by the coal verdict, former Coal India chairman Partha Bhattacharya , and former union power minister Suresh Prabhu.

"The judgment should be seen as a great opportunity to make large-scale structural reforms in the coal sector. Reforms have bypassed the coal sector in the right sense of the word," the former Coal India chairman, who navigated a tricky maze of union protests to lead it to its IPO, told CNBC-TV18.

The view was seconded by Prabhu , the NDA 1 power minister who had retreated from active political life these past few years, but who is now back in the limelight, being seen as one of the key advisors to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on matters of energy.

The Modi government has remain tight-lipped on the issue of whether de-nationalization of the coal sector could be on the cards. The move could be highly unpopular among unions and it is not known whether such a proposal could pass muster in the Rajya Sabha, where the ruling BJP is well short of a majority.

The second, and the safer, option would be open up the blocks to similar end-use companies but in an auction process.

But there are already questions that whether a formal auction process can be instituted in the six months between now and the fiscal year end after which Coal India, already under stress to meet its own targets, will have to take over the blocks.

"If an open bidding process takes place [after March 2015], there would be questions over how Coal India could operate them in the interim. There are several issues related to land rights, etc, as well there will be questions of how liabilities or profit/revenue-sharing would be structured," Feedback Infra co-chairman RS Ramasubramaniam told CNBC-TV18.

The government has pledged it would make sure alternate arrangements for power plants are made even in the event production drops during the block handover but hasn't spelled how.

One way could importing more coal from countries such as Indonesia – India's biggest coal trading partner. Last year, India imported about 170 million tonne and importing another 40 million tonne a year (the amount estimated to be produced from the de-allocated mines) should be a costly but possible option.

"To curb transportation costs (from ports to plants), the government can look at a sort of a swap program whereby imported coal is provided to plants nearer to the coast while those in the hinterland are served by Coal India," Deloitte senior director Debashish Mishra said.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

CCI orders fresh probe against Jaiprakash Associates

The latest investigation has been ordered by the fair trade watchdog on a complaint filed by a buyer at the company's 'Kensington Park at Jaypee Greens' residential project in Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

Competition Commission has ordered a fresh probe against  Jaiprakash Associates for alleged unfair business practices in imposing unreasonable conditions on buyers at one of its realty projects.

The latest investigation has been ordered by the fair trade watchdog on a complaint filed by a buyer at the company's 'Kensington Park at Jaypee Greens' residential project in Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

The complaint alleged that the firm was imposing certain anti-competitive clauses in its agreements for buyers.

The Commission noted that the allegations made in the complaint were similar to certain other cases against Jaiprakash Associates wherein the regulator has already ordered a probe by its Director General (DG).

CCI is presently probing Jaiprakash Associates in atleast four other matters related to unfair trade practices in the real estate market.

After looking into the latest complaint, Competition Commission of India (CCI) formed "a prima facie opinion" that the company is in the dominant position in the residential market in Noida and Greater Noida and had violated fair trade
norms.

"The Commission is of the prima facie opinion that there appears to be a case of contravention of...the (Competition) Act in the matter," CCI said in the order dated September 24. Accordingly, CCI has asked DG to investigate the matter.

The Commission has found that some of the clauses of the agreement "prima facie, appear to be unfair, one sided and loaded in favour of opposite party (Jaiprakash Associates)".

Along with Jaiprakash Associates, CCI has also ordered probe into "the role of the officials/persons who at the time of such contravention were in-charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company".

While noting that there were other real estate players in the market in Noida region, the fair trade regulator said that "the land bank available with Jaypee Group is much higher than that available with any other developer".

Jaiprakash Asso stock price

On September 26, 2014, Jaiprakash Associates closed at Rs 27.15, up Rs 1.40, or 5.44 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 88.80 and the 52-week low was Rs 24.05.


The latest book value of the company is Rs 56.48 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company was 0.48.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Jumbo Bag: Outcome of AGM

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 25 September 2014 | 18.00

Jumbo Bag Ltd has informed BSE that the 24th Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Company was held on September 25, 2014.

To read the full report click here


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Sanguine Media approves sub-division of equity shares

Sanguine Media Ltd has informed BSE that the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting held on September 25, 2014, has approved sub-division of equity shares. Every shareholders holding 1 equity share of Rs 10 each will be allotted 10 equity share of Re 1 each.

Sanguine Media Ltd has informed BSE that the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting held on September 25, 2014, has decided the following matters:1. Approved sub-division of equity shares. Every shareholders holding 1 (One) equity share of Rs. 10/- each will be allotted 10 (Ten) equity share of Re. 1/- each.2. To hold the Shareholders meeting in due course.Source : BSE

Read all announcements in Sanguine Media


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

TGB Banquets: Outcome of AGM

TGB Banquets and Hotels Ltd has informed BSE that the 15th Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Company was held on September 25, 2014.

To read the full report click here


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Ishan Dyes: Outcome of AGM

Ishan Dyes & Chemicals Ltd has informed BSE that the 21st Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Company was held on September 23, 2014.

Ishan Dyes & Chemicals Ltd has informed BSE that the 21st Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Company was held on September 23, 2014.Source : BSE

Read all announcements in Ishan Dyes

To read the full report click here


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

SBI approves sub-division of equity shares

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 24 September 2014 | 18.01

State Bank of India at its meeting held on September 24, 2014 has considered and accorded its approval to reduce the face value of equity shares of the Bank from Rs 10 per share to Re 1 per share and to increase the number of issued shares in proportion thereof.

State Bank of India has informed BSE that in terms of the provisions of Section 4 of the State Bank of India Act, 1955, the Central Board of the Bank at its meeting held on September 24, 2014 has considered and accorded its approval to the following:-1. To reduce the face value of equity shares of the Bank from Rs. 10 per share to Rs. 1 per share and to increase the number of issued shares in proportion thereof.

2. To arrange to mirror the reduction in face value of equity shares in existing GDR programme.Source : BSE

Read all announcements in SBI


18.01 | 0 komentar | Read More

VCU Data Management's director Shripal Bafna resigns

VCU Data Management Ltd has informed BSE that the Board of Directors of the Company has accepted the resignation of Mr. Shripal Bafna, Director of the Company w.e.f. May 30, 2014.

VCU Data Management Ltd has informed BSE that the Board of Directors of the Company has accepted the resignation of Mr. Shripal Bafna, Director of the Company w.e.f. May 30, 2014.Source : BSE

Read all announcements in VCU Data Mgmt


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

'India to act on climate change on its own volition'

India will take action on climate change not "at somebody's dictation" but on its own volition, Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar has said.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is "very much interested in climate change and environmental issues. He has proved it in Gujarat for 12 years that both conservation and protection of environment along with development is simultaneously possible," Javadekar told PTI in an interview.

Minister of State for Environment, Forests and Climate Change Javadekar was here yesterday to represent India at the high-level Climate Change summit organised by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

He said Modi's absence from the summit does not mean that India is not serious about climate change.

"We are serious. (Modi) is committed (on climate change issues). We are doing our action but it is not at somebody's dictation, it is on our own volition," he said.

Javadekar stressed that India demands that the developed world "should not come out with new terminology" every time but "now walk the talk" on tackling climate change and cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

"What we expect from the world is that the developed world must walk the talk on the Green Climate Fund as well as cutting their own emissions," he said adding that for India, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is the real mandate.

While there can be complimentary efforts to strengthen action, Javadekar said that parallel efforts will divert attention.

"We want to work under the UNFCCC mandate. There is scope for negotiations. We expect that Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) are determined nationally and not internationally," he said.

Javadekar said that while India's INDCs will be "ambitious enough", at the same time basic principles of equity are also important.

"All will take responsibility, all will act but responsibility of developed countries is different and that must be recognised," he said.

Javadekar said India expects that the UN climate conference in Lima in December should bring out more contours, more basic framework of the text which will be ultimately negotiated in Paris next year.

"The process of INDCs will gear up by that time. That can be discussed as good practices but they cannot be subjected to any kind of scrutiny," he said.

Javadekar said India will pro-actively engage on environmental issues and will quantify its initiatives and contributions in the area.

On the issue of Green Climate Fund, he said, India wants critical technologies should be freely available, which can save costs but at the same time benefit all countries to develop their clean energy path.

On Modi's upcoming "historic" visit to the US, Javadekar said India has strategic relations with the US and it values the bilateral relationship.

He described the dialogue between Obama and Modi as "all important" that will produce results "which will benefit both countries."

Javadekar said Modi will address the UN General Assembly in Hindi, years after former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee also spoke in Hindi to the world audience at the UN.

"The content (of Modi's UN speech) will be also be very important and not just the format. He makes speeches beyond people's perception, he goes one step ahead and speaks from the heart. He will express with confidence the way on which we have already started," Javadekar said.

He said the Indian-American people are thrilled at Modi's visit and eager to welcome "a leader who has arrived, who has created history."


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

State Bank of India board approves stock split

"The board of directors of the bank, in a meeting on September 24, decided to reduce the face value of equity shares of the bank from Rs 10 per share to Rs 1 per share and to increase the number of issued shares in proportion thereof," said the company in its filing.

Moneycontrol Bureau

India's largest lender  State Bank of India (SBI) has approved sub division of its shares following stock split announcement from other leading lenders like ICICI Bank, Punjab National Bank and Axis Bank.

"The board of directors of the bank, in a meeting on September 24, decided to reduce the face value of equity shares of the bank from Rs 10 per share to Rs 1 per share and to increase the number of issued shares in proportion thereof," said the company in its filing.

The board also decided to mirror the reduction in face value of equity shares in existing GDR programme.

Earlier in the month, on September 9, ICICI Bank's board too approved a stock split in the ratio of 1:5, with PNB following suit on September 22, splitting its share in the same ratio.

ICICI Bank  board approved the sub-division of one equity share having face value of Rs 10/- each into five (5) equity shares of face value of Rs 2/- each. Pursuant to the sub-division of equity shares, additional proportionate American Depository Shares (ADS) would be issued to maintain the ratio of one ADS to two equity shares.

PNB  board also considered and granted in-principle approval for spilt of existing equity shares of face value Rs 10/- each into 5 equity shares of face value of Rs. 2/- each.

Axis Bank  also underwent a stock split on July 30, according to which its shareholders would be entitled to receive 5 (Five) equity shares of nominal value of Rs. 2/- each in lieu of 1 (One) equity share of nominal value of Rs. 10/- each.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Alibaba's stellar listing a boost to Indian ecommerce cos?

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 23 September 2014 | 18.01

Alibaba, China's biggest e-commerce company, debuted on NYSE on September 19 with largest-ever IPO at USD 25 billion. The company was listed at nearly 40 percent premium to its issue price after which, underwriters exercised a green shoe option to sell an additional 48 million American depositary shares, making Alibaba's IPO the biggest in history taking the value of the deal to USD 25 billion.

Although Alibaba has taken 15 years to reach its current position, it has had consistent nimbleness in its operations. However, Karan Marwah, Partner - Capital Markets Advisory, KPMG says Alibaba operates an online business-to-business (B2B) marketplace together unlike Amazon or Flipkart that sell products to end consumers directly.

In terms of servicing the e-commerce sector, the bottleneck for the e-commerce has been the infrastructure and key challenges such as logistics or even the ease of getting payments from customers like cash on delivery being unique trend in India, he says in an interview with CNBC-TV18's Senthil Chengalvarayan and Sonia Shenoy.

Interestingly, few of large e-commerce companies have the scale and ambition but there are smaller ones doing reasonably well and are looking at niche markets, he adds.

Joining the bullish stance on Indian e-commerce business, Rohit Bansal, chief executive officer, Snapdeal.com says, "There is no reason to believe that in 10-20 years e-commerce in India will be anything less than 10 percent of retail. By that time, retail in itself will be a trillion dollar market. So there is absolutely a 100 percent possibility of creating a USD 100 billion e-commerce company out of India."

Below is the edited transcript of the interview:

Q: Do you concur with Snapdeal's Rohit Bansal's view that this could be USD 100 billion business in the next 10-20 years in India itself?

A: Quite clearly, we are at a stage where we have a bunch of all these companies that have grown to a scale and have the ambition to clearly grow to those levels. Even from a market perspective, one needs to keep in mind the fact that where we are vis-à-vis China where Alibaba has grown out. If you look at things like internet penetration, the extent to which the infrastructure has been developed in China vis-à-vis India, we are at a stage where we can and will grow to a level, which should be pretty comparable to where China is today. Obviously, the relative age of the business and the sector in India vis-à-vis the time at that it has had to grow in China.

Q: 10 percent of retail in the next 10-20 years. I know that is a broad range timeframe but do you think you can get to 10 percent of the retail business?

A: I don't have a crystal ball to say whether it is going to be 10 percent or not but clearly the indicators are all poised to that kind of growth provided we can get infrastructure right, there is clearly no reason why we cannot get there.

The bottleneck in my mind has been that the infrastructure and the key challenges e-commerce has faced is logistics or even the ease of getting payments from customers like cash on delivery being unique trend here.

Q: What are the opportunities to investors here at the moment? Obviously they cannot invest in e-commerce companies on their own but what are the ancillary businesses that you see growing in tandem?

A: Clearly, logistics is in my mind a huge space and if someone can get that story right in terms of servicing the e-commerce sector, keeping in mind our infrastructural bottlenecks; that is a big space to watch out for in my mind.

Q: Both Flipkart and Snapdeal have announced their ambitions to become the next Alibaba in India but Alibaba is a conglomerate. They have an equivalent of eBay, PayPal and that is what runs their business but if you just look at Flipkart, it has shut down its payment gateway business last month or so. Do you think that any of these companies have it in them to become next Alibaba?

A: I cannot say whether they are going to be the next Alibaba but the way they have grown in the last few years that they have been around -- again I go back to the point I made earlier, one has to keep in mind the relative age of some of these companies vis-à-vis Alibaba for example. It has taken Alibaba 15 years to get to the scale at which it operates and one of the amazing things about Alibaba has been the nimbleness in its operating models, it has grown, it has changed, it has listened to feedbacks, it has looked at what is working, what not working and adapted itself. You see that happening in India too. Let us say, a company had shut down its logistics or the payment gateway, the point is you have to be receptive to what is happening in the market and as long as you can adapt, you continue to grow.

Q: How long it will take for some of the Indian companies to grow because not just do they have their own company specific hurdles to cross, even India as an economy - if you look at mobile broadband penetration for example, it is much less than even some of our neighbours like Nepal and Bhutan leave alone some of the developed countries. So how long do you think it would take for us to get there?

A: One hopes that with the new government's push on infrastructure, things do look up in all aspects whether it is internet penetration or the state of our highways or new warehousing. All of these are components to the growth of retail and more specifically e-commerce too. But again as far as individual companies go, the interesting thing is that a few of these large companies which clearly have the scale and ambition one also needs to think about the smaller ones that are looking at niche markets and niche spaces which are also doing reasonably well.

Q: How much of a threat is Amazon going to be to all of these players in India?

A: It is huge.

Q: Can you just roll them all over?

A: It has the ambition and the will to do so. The question is the fact that one needs to keep in mind the regulatory aspects here. How quickly can our regulators move to allow Amazon to have full access to the market and is that going to be too late given the incumbent advantage that some of the other big players have here. Those are the things that one needs to keep in mind but clearly they have got the ambition to do exactly what you said.

Q: I am sure you interact with a lot of venture capitalists (VCs) etc. Are you getting any signs of increased interest into the Indian markets in this particular industry especially from VCs like Tiger Global etc, which have investments in Alibaba?

A: Quite clearly, one has seen a flurry of activity from the venture capitalist especially for the sector. If you look at the amount of investments that some of these companies have attracted, that is the other aspect in terms of their stage of evolution vis-à-vis an Alibaba let us say. I think some of these companies are reasonably well funded at least for the next few years whether it is in terms of operational needs or inorganic growth. So as far as that goes, I think there is clearly an interest and that interest continues to sort of grow.


18.01 | 0 komentar | Read More

Ranjit Kapadia bullish on Lupin, positive on Sanofi India

Ranjit Kapadia, Senior Vice President at Centrum Broking is bullish on Lupin and has a positive view on Sanofi India.

Ranjit Kapadia, Senior Vice President at Centrum Broking told CNBC-TV18, "We are bullish on  Lupin  and positive on  Sanofi India . Sanofi India is a company which had a maximum hit on the back of NPPA price control guidelines and it is going to get maximum benefit from this development."

On September 23, 2014 Lupin closed at Rs 1,356.05, down Rs 32.60, or 2.35 percent. It has touched an intraday high of Rs 1,404 and an intraday low of Rs 1,350.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Book some profit in Wipro: Meghana Malkan

Meghana Malkan, Trading Coach at malkansview.com is of the view that one book some profits in Wipro and feels that one can enter India Cements or even enter Titan Company.

Meghana Malkan, Trading Coach at malkansview.com told CNBC-TV18, " Wipro  has the momentum on its side but overall the weekly and the monthly chart has been resisting and crossing the all time high levels of Rs 600 which is the previous high. So it has been resisting there, it has been showing some technical signs of weakness and some cracks."

"One can book some profit In Wipro and then could wait for a dip again to re-enter. One could enter India Cements  or even enter Titan Company , that would give a better return rather than waiting for Wipro to cross the high levels," she added.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Cong, NCP seat-sharing talks inconclusive

Senior Congress leader Narayan Rane told reporters that the two sides have decided to meet again at 8.30 PM as "no solution could be arrived at."

Congress and NCP leaders met this morning to decide on seat sharing for Maharashtra Assembly elections but the talks were "inconclusive."

Senior Congress leader Narayan Rane told reporters that the two sides have decided to meet again at 8.30 PM as "no solution could be arrived at."

The meeting was held at Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan's official residence - Varsha. Congress has been refusing to yield to NCP's demand for equal seats, while the latter has rejected offer of 124 of the state's 288 Assembly seats.

NCP leader Praful Patel and Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, state party chief Sunil Tatkare and other leaders attended the meeting, to resolve the seat-sharing deadlock and salvage the 15-year-old alliance.

State Congress chief Manikrao Thakre, who was present at the meeting, also said the "talks were inconclusive." NCP's core committee chaired by party chief Sharad Pawar had gone into a huddle here yesterday where it reaffirmed that the alliance should continue but insisted on getting a larger share of the state's 288 Assembly seats than 124 offered by Congress.

NCP had contested 114 and Congress 174 in 2009 Assembly elections and has been insisting on fielding candidates in half of the 288 seats, citing it had double the number of Lok Sabha seats in the state than Congress. In the worst-ever performance for the ruling alliance, NCP had won 4 Lok Sabha seats against Congress' 2.

Also read:  Shiv Sena gives BJP 130 seats, keeps 151 in Maha: Sources


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Mars mission enters last lap; crucial test on September 24

Written By Unknown on Senin, 22 September 2014 | 18.00

India's first mission to Mars will attempt to put a spacecraft in orbit around the red planet next week, in a crucial test of a low-cost project carrying the country's hopes to join the leaders of a global space race.

A successful outcome for the USD 74-million mission would stiffen Prime Minister Narendra Modi's resolve to build new space launch facilities capable of handling heavier satellites, to make India a stronger player in the space technology market.

Launched last November, the Mars Orbiter Mission, called Mangalyaan, aims to study the planet's surface and mineral composition, and scan its atmosphere for methane, a chemical strongly tied to life on Earth.

If the spacecraft does manage to enter orbit around Mars on Sept 24, India would become the first country to succeed on its first try. European, US and Russian probes have managed to orbit or land on the planet, but only after several attempts.

"Confidence is high," V. Koteswara Rao, scientific secretary at the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), told Reuters. "All the operations done so far are successful and all the parameters measured are normal."

ISRO has already uploaded commands to help the spacecraft automatically enter orbit on the morning of Sept. 24.

Two days before that, scientists will run a four-second test of a main engine that has been idle for about 300 days, and make a small course correction, Rao said.

However, experts say it will be challenging to get the trajectory right and cut the craft's speed from its current rate of 22 km (13.7 miles) per second to allow it to enter orbit. So also would be the task of receiving the faint signals it emits.

"It's like hitting a one-rupee coin about a hundred kilometres away, and that is tough," said Mayank N. Vahia, a scientist in the department of astronomy and astrophysics at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.

ISRO has prepared a contingency plan. If the main engine fails to restart, eight small fuel-powered thrusters will be used to put the spacecraft into orbit around Mars.

LOW-COST MODEL & CHINA

India launched its space programme five decades ago and developed its own rocket technology after Western powers imposed sanctions for a nuclear weapons test in 1974. In 2009, its Chandrayaan satellite found evidence of water on the moon.

Although facing strong competition from neighbour China, India aspires to be a low-cost supplier of space technology and grab a bigger slice of a more than $300-billion industry.

India has so far launched 40 foreign satellites, many of them for advanced nations.

Still, China has an edge, as it can put heavier satellites into orbit with its bigger launchers.

Modi aims to change that. In June, he hailed the Mars mission's low cost, saying it was less than the budget of the Hollywood space movie 'Gravity'.

A successful Mars mission would boost the global standing of India's state-run space agency.

"It increases the prestige and reliability of India as a spacefaring nation whose rockets and payloads are reliable enough for other countries to use," said Vahia.

India's Mangalyaan cost roughly a tenth of NASA's Mars mission Maven that will attempt to enter orbit around the planet three days earlier on Sept. 21.

Despite its recent success, India's space programme has often drawn criticism as Asia's third-largest economy still ranks poorly on basic social indicators of poverty and hunger.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

US war on Islamic terror: Can only Muslims fight it on own?

R Jagannathan
Firstpost.com

The West's war against terrorism—the Islamic State (also referred to as ISIS and ISIL) being the latest designated villain—is likely to end in stalemate or failure. When President Barack Obama said last week that he is going to "degrade and ultimately destroy" the Islamic State, we have to dismiss it as macho talk. This is pretty much what President George W Bush said after 9/11 about Al Qaeda, but despite killing thousands of alleged terrorists through drone attacks and targeted assassinations, al-Qaeda is very much around and recently even announced the formation of a South Asian branch headquartered in Pakistan.

The terror business is akin to a banyan tree – but without its limitations. Each terror branch is capable of growing its own roots and creating a new tree. But being mobile and flexible, terrorism is more than just a banyan – it is capable of growing roots far from its original place of birth. This is why even as Obama claims al-Qaeda has been degraded, a fiercer version of Al Qaeda (the Islamic State) has emerged in another place, and a more blood-thirsty Taliban is now threatening the Pakistani state itself - the state which nurtured them. And even as Israel degrades some Palestinian groups, another emerges somewhere else. First it was PLA, then al-Fatah, and now Hamas.

Defeating terrorism needs more than false bravado. It needs a much better understanding of what needs to be done beyond bombings and assassinations. A few obvious truths are thus worth restating.

One, terrorism can be defeated only if enough people from the community that consistently throws up terrorists decide to take them on. This is not quite the case despite the alleged creation of a coalition of Islamic nation-states against terror. George Bush's anti-terror coalition in Iraq and Afghanistan was largely a Christian coalition - with marginal and (often unwilling) participation by Muslim countries (Pakistan, for example). Now, as Obama prepares to cut his losses is Iraq and Afghanistan, the US is essentially leaving behind big chaos and new terror groups are springing up in both areas.

Only Muslims countries and groups can defeat terror if they combine to eliminate it. Currently, though, most of them are aiding it.

Consider what Obama said the other day.� the Islamic State, he claimed, was not "Islamic."� He added: "No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL's [another moniker�for the Islamic State] victims have been Muslim." For a man whose middle name is Hussein, this is na�ve. Surely Obama knows that all theocratic regimes tend to devour their own more than the enemy. Pakistani hardline groups kill Shias and Ahmaddiyas more than they kill Christians or Sikhs or Hindus.

After the� beheading of a British aid worker , British Prime Minister David Cameron claimed those who did the beheading "claim to do this in the name of Islam. That is nonsense. Islam is a religion of peace.� They are not Muslims, they are monsters."

These are pointless statements, for neither Obama nor Cameron is any kind of Islam expert who can pronounce anyone as not "Islamic" or "not Muslim". In fact, Muslims themselves would not be able to tell us what they think is true Islam or fake Islam. There are several versions of it. The fact remains: fundamentalists kill and injure in the name of Islam, and that is what matters. The definition of what is Islam is irrelevant here.

As atheist� Sam Harris said in his blog,� soon after Obama made his the Islamic State�speech, "beliefs guide behaviour and certain religious ideas — jihad, martyrdom, blasphemy, apostasy — reliably lead to oppression and murder. It may be true that no faith teaches people to massacre�innocents�exactly — but innocence, as the President surely knows, is in the eye of the beholder. Are apostates 'innocent'? Blasphemers? Polytheists?"

Ultimately, only Muslims can decide what their faith is really about, and it is ordinary Muslims who have to decide whether to take on the Islamic State�or join it. The rest of the world should merely be prepared to ensure that these battles don't do much damage in their own countries.

Two, unlike a straightforward war where the combatants know who the enemy is, in the case of terrorism one cannot tell�who is who. For Muslims, however, it is obvious who is bashing whom: Christians (and Jews) are doing the bashing and Muslims are at the receiving end on the anti-terror war.

This means the west cannot deal with Islamic terrorism and assume there will be no repercussions. As the late Samuel Huntington, author of�The Clash of Civilisations, explained about the US invasion of Iraq and why the Arabs hated it. "Arabs and other Muslims generally agree that Saddam Hussein might be a bloody tyrant, but, paralleling FDR's thinking, 'he is our bloody tyrant'. In their view, the invasion was a family affair to be settled within the family and those who intervened in the name of some grand theory of international justice were doing so to protect their own selfish interests and to maintain Arab subordination to the West."

Three, a rigid standing army cannot defeat a flexible guerrilla force that does not seem to face any issues of ideological motivation or a shortage of new recruits. As decades of handling insurgency in India have shown, terror is better handled by local action that uses irregular methods to deal with terrorism (KPS Gill's rough-and-ready methods in Punjab, or the Andhra Greyhounds against Naxals).

To this extent, Obama's decision to only bomb terrorists from the air or bump them off through targeted killings is better than George Bush's decision to send troops into what Muslims consider their land, but it creates another frustration among them--a sense of powerlessness against a superpower. Terror is often about the weak trying to get even with the powerful. The more Americans are able to target Islamic terrorists at will, the more ordinary Muslims will think they are at least "our bastards".

Four, terror can only be brought under a degree of control. It cannot be eliminated altogether. Even a wholly peaceful place called Norway saw Anders Behring Breivik bomb government buildings and kill 69 people in mass shootings in 2011, apparently driven by anti-Islam sentiments. The point is terrorists are essentially of two types – the powerless trying to deal with those who have a lot of power, or those who have a sense of grievance, real or imagined. Since neither the nature of global power nor local or regional grievances are going to come down anytime soon, there will always be some amount of people willing to dabble in terrorism. The best one can do is limit the damage by being vigilant and reducing the sense of grievance that people develop.

The US needs to take these factors into account before redrawing its own anti-terror strategy, but its real problem is its own coalition of Islamic allies. Almost all its west Asian allies are promoting some for of radicalism – from Saudi Arabia to Qatar to Iran to Pakistan – and hence can hardly be called allies against terror.�(Read this piece by Sreeram Sundar Chaulia in� The Times of India �to get a flavour of America's Allied Enemies).

The weakness of the western anti-terror strategy stems from its allies – who are both perpetrators of extremism and/or ambivalent towards one form of terror or the other.

The best US strategy (and for India) should thus be simple: a defensive one based on safeguarding the US and other victim countries from terror attacks at home and abroad. Currently, India's incompetence and non-strategy of doing nothing about terror is working as well as the aggressive US strategy of bombing and killing terrorists. Terrorists know that India has the ability to roll with the punches and recover repeatedly.

The US is luckier, since it has good neighbours and is protected by vast oceans on both sides. This makes it geographically invulnerable. After 9/11, it has essentially sealed itself off from the world even more by ever-more-intrusive checks, spying and covert action.

But this is the point: it has only made America's enemies angrier and more anti-American.

In the end, America's war on terror cannot be won only with force and power. The best anti-terror strategy is intelligence, vigilance, and a defensive stance. Trying to aggressively kill terrorists indiscriminately will only generate more terrorists.

The Islamic State, Boko Haram, Hamas and Al Qaeda — among others — are manifestations of the failure of the American war on terror.

The war on Islamic terror can ultimately be won only by Muslims fighting it on their own - at best with covert support from the rest of the world. The rest of the world should focus on protecting themselves, not aggressive alienation of terrorists. America cannot lead this war on terror.

The writer is editor-in-chief, digital and publishing, Network18 Group


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Where does Pakistan fit into the India-China equation?

R Jagannathan
Firstpost.com

Narendra Modi 's spirited efforts to bring up the Ladakh border incursions with Chinese President Xi Jinping is unlikely to make much of a difference to what the Chinese have been doing so far – and will continue to do in future. When Modi said we need an understanding to maintain peace and tranquillity on the border, Jinping merely noted that "there may be some incidents as the area is not clearly demarcated". He also made a vague reference to� resolve the issue "at an early date."

It won't happen. For China is not keen on peace with status quo. The two sides have different ideas of what we want settled. The power equation is also heavily tilted in favour of the Chinese, even though, if it ever comes to war, we are unlikely to be as unprepared as we were in 1962. We have emerged from Nehruvian woolly-headedness, but we are far from having a long-term strategic understanding of how to deter the Chinese.

To deal with the Chinese, we need to know what they want, what we want, what their geopolitical worldview is, how they see India-China power equations evolving over the next few decades, and what levers we have to counter them and they us. Above all we need to understand Chinese history and what drives them to do what they do.

So, what do we want from the Chinese?�Unfortunately, there is no mystery about it. Even the Chinese know the answer: we want status quo, and an assurance that China will respect current borders and areas under our control. No one, not in India or in China, believes we are actually expecting a return of the real estate they grabbed from us in 1962.

But China is not a status quo power in the Indian sub-continent. This is the first thing we need to understand about their intentions. They want to change the status quo, while we want to preserve it.

And, what do the Chinese want?�The Chinese want several things: they want to be the hegemons of Asia. They want a Pax Sina where they are the Asiacops and all other powers are subservient to them. Anyone who is willing to accept Chinese supremacy will be showered with their largesse. They want control of the South China Sea and all the sea routes and undersea resources around the Chinese coast. This brings them in conflict with almost the whole of Asia, but having the whole world for your enemy does not deter them. They believe they have the power to enforce their writ. This is why they will do almost anything to prevent a Japan-India-Vietnam power axis from forming.

But this is their general geopolitical goal in Asia. In the Indian subcontinent, they want three things from us: more areas in Ladakh so that their roads to the Indian Ocean via Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir, and to Tibet have greater defensible depth (this is why they want India out of Siachen, and they are using Pakistan to propel this idea of demilitarising Siachen). They also want Tawang - which houses the second most important Tibetan monastery - and more of Arunachal Pradesh, maybe all of it. Overall, they want India to play by Chinese rules. It is to put pressure on India to settle the border on Chinese terms that they are doing big infrastructure deals with Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and even Myanmar and Maldives.

Where does Pakistan fit into the India-China equation?�Apart from the above string-of-pearls alliances with countries in the Indian sub-continent, the Chinese clearly use Pakistan as their attack dog. Whatever China wants achieved coercively from India, it will do so through Pakistan. We need to understand that the China-Pakistan relationship is merely a patron-client one. When China says bark, Pakistan will bark. When it says bite, Pakistan will bite.

This does not mean Pakistan is a great ally or that the Chinese have any respect for Pakistan. Absolutely not. Just the reverse. The Chinese have only contempt for Pakistan because they know it is a basket case and a future danger to their north-western borders, where the Uighur Muslim minority is emerging as a more potent threat than restive Tibetans. The Chinese regard Pakistanis as "very useful idiots" in their strategy to keep India tied down and pressured to settle with them. If we ever agree to Chinese terms of settling the border and accept their supremacy, they will almost immediately change their tune on Pakistan. The Pakistanis know this, but can't do much because they are pariahs in the eyes of the rest of the world. The world knows Pakistan is the snake-pit of global jihad. Pakistanis are holding on to China for dear life. It suits China to use Pakistan against us.

It is thus in India's interest to let Pakistan break up and deal fairly with the remnant states. West Asian and Indian history teaches us that Islam has never been able to bind countries and people on the basis of religion. This is not just my view, but that of Maulana Azad - the only Indian Muslim who could see the damage partition would do to Muslims in India.

As long as Pakistan remains a vassal state of China, it will be inimical to India and ever willing to be used as a pawn against us. Already it has ceded territory close to Siachen to the Chinese in order to strengthen the Karakorum route.

Why is China such an aggressive neighbour?�Partly it comes from their history. The Chinese have gone to great lengths to be a unified state, and they have fought brutal wars among themselves to achieve this end. Long before the world had heard of nation states, the Chinese created one as early as 221 BC, with the arrival of the Qin dynasty. The Chinese political development has been one way – from thousands of small tribes to One China. Around 2000 BC, the Chinese had around 3,000 groups of peoples or polities, according to Francis Fukuyama, author of�The Origins of Political Order.�In 1500 BC, this was down to 1,800, by 1200 BC to 170, dropping down to 23, seven and finally One China by 221 BC.

In contrast, India achieved political unity only under the British – and more formally 67 years ago.

Unification and state-building always is achieved through war. As Fukuyama writes: "In both China and Europe, state formation was driven primarily by the need to wage war…..War was without question the single most important driver of state formation during China's Eastern Zhou dynasty. Between the beginning of the Eastern Zhou in 770 BC and the consolidation of the Qin dynasty in 221 BC, China experienced an unremitting series of wars that increased in scale, costliness and human lives."

What this tells us is that the Chinese went through many brutal wars to achieve unity and this means they are always willing to go to war to achieve a political purpose. They see unification and homogenisation as an end in itself. Hence their belligerence on Tibet and Taiwan. They consider Arunachal Pradesh as southern Tibet.

Does this mean we will ultimately have to go to war with China?

No, what this means is that they will do so if they perceive us as weak. They only respect power, and India has to steadily build its economic and military power in order to deter the Chinese.

As a lonely power - Pratap Bhanu Mehta calls both America and China as� fairly friendless superpowers� – China sees red whenever other powers get together. This is why when Modi planned a Japan visit, the Chinese President quickly came a-calling.

The only other thing China respects apart from hard power is India's soft power. India and China are two of the world's oldest civilisations. As such, India's soft power in the world can rival China's. Moreover, given our completely different power trajectories, the world fears China but sees no harm, even welcomes, the rise of a more powerful India.

The strategy for India to follow vis-�-vis China must thus comprise the following elements.

One, faster economic growth and steady improvements in military capability.

Two,�regular engagement on the border and other disputes with China. This is to prevent misunderstandings from leading to skirmishes.

Three, building a China containment coalition along with Japan and Vietnam.

Four, steady projection of India's soft power in the west and south-east Asia to counter China.

Five, maintain internal unity by avoiding needless talk of Hindutva and other such divisive issues.

Six, keep trading with China for mutual benefit, but insist that they must start closing the trade gap. Whatever the level of trade, Chinese political aims will not change towards India.

The Chinese know that Indians have not traditionally been strategic thinkers. It is up to us to prove them wrong.

The purpose of Xi Jinping's visit was to test Modi's nerves and check out what stuff he is made of. He landed in Gujarat to see if Modi can be flattered to go soft on China. Hopefully, he found out that was not the case.

The writer is editor-in-chief, digital and publishing, Network18 Group


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

India Healthcare Awards: Mantras for healthy lifestyle

In this curtain raiser episode of India Healthcare Awards - take a look at how our lifestyle is impacting our health and find out from experts what should be done to keep the diseases at bay.

In this curtain raiser episode of India Healthcare Awards - take a look at how our lifestyle is impacting our health and find out from experts what should be done to keep the diseases at bay.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Improve Indian labour policy to attract investments: VIP

Written By Unknown on Minggu, 21 September 2014 | 18.00

Dilip Piramal, chairman,  VIP Industries says India needs to attract investments and one way of doing that is by improving labour polices among other measures.

This is coming from an affected party as Piramal had pulled out his plant from India and set it up in China because of intractable labour laws in India.

Also Read: Diplomatic talks aside, China still bypasses Indian exports

"Indian unions are so strong that once the company is flourishing, they demand very high wages like say Rs 20,000 - 25,000 a month. At that wage level our manufacturing cost, the labour cost of that product goes up to about 15 to 20 percent. That's 10 percent higher than what we can get from China. The Chinese manufacturing wage bill is not even 5 percent. So, this 10 percent or 15 percent price differential is much more than what we can sustain," he explains.

Below is the edited transcript of the interview to CNBC-TV18.

Q: Since you pulled out investments from India and put them in China it is tough to expect why Chinese will invest USD 20 billion in India if their investment climate is so much better than ours, will they?

A: There is no connection between the two things or rather the two things are on opposite sides. If today we have Indian companies like ours importing, getting a lot of sales from the products made in China and importing them all the way to India, then what is the logic of Chinese companies investing in India.

However, it also depends on the type of products; I mean each industry is different so obviously the Chinese won't be investing in these low wage goods like luggage which I am importing but I guess they will invest more in the heavy industries like chemical industries and all which are better located in the country where they are sold. So, I really don't know where China will be investing in India. But let say so many areas like infrastructure particularly which have to be implemented in the country itself and cannot be easily like outsourced, you cannot outsource laying of railway tracks and all. So maybe they might be investing in such areas where they do have lot of expertise.

Q: What was the compelling reason that pulled you into China? Why did you invest there and what does India need to change?

A: I will give you the example of luggage itself and this can be sort of same example is there for readymade garments which is one of the largest industries in the world. What happens is that these are very low cost goods and where normally labour cost is about 10 percent of the cost of manufacturing these products.

What happens in India is that the unions are so strong that once the company is flourishing, they demand very high wages something like say Rs 20,000 - 25,000 a month. And at that wage level our manufacturing cost, the labour cost of that product goes up to about 15 to 20 percent. That's 10 percent higher than what we can get from China or rather the Chinese manufacturing wage bill is not even 5 percent. So, this 10 percent or 15 percent price differential is much more than what we can sustain.

Q: So what can we change to become a compelling investment destination for the Chinese?

A: We have to make India a better place to invest in and have an environment which is more conducive for manufacturing. What is required for that is a general infrastructure has to be good like land number one has to be available at good prices which itself has now become a big problem because government has increased the price of acquisition of land. Then you need a general infrastructure like power supply, good wage or good labour supply which we have, but if they change the wage labour policies then it will become even better. 


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

ICICI Pru MF launches Multiple Yield Fund - Series 7 -1100D

ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund launches ICICI Prudential Multiple Yield Fund - Series 7 - Plan F, a close ended income fund with the objective to seek to generate returns by investing in a portfolio of fixed income securities/ debt instruments.

ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund has launched a new fund as ICICI Prudential Multiple Yield Fund - Series 7 - Plan F, a close ended income fund. The tenure of the plan is 1100 days from the date of allotment of units. 

The primary objective of the scheme is to seek to generate returns by investing in a portfolio of fixed income securities/ debt instruments. The secondary objective of the scheme is to generate long term capital appreciation by investing a portion of the scheme's assets in equity and equity related instruments. 

The new fund offer (NFO) will open for subscription from September 23, to October 07, 2014. The new fund offer price for the scheme is Rs 10 per unit. The scheme is proposed to be listed on NSE. 

The scheme offers direct and regular plan. Each plan will offer cumulative and dividend option. Dividend payout is the only facility available under dividend option. 

The minimum application amount is Rs 5000 and in multiples of Re 1 thereafter.

The entry and exit load charge are not applicable for the scheme 

The scheme will allocate 70% to 95% of assets in debt securities (including government securities) with low to medium risk profile. It would allocate upto 20% of assets in money market instruments, cash and cash equivalents with low to medium risk profile and it would allocate 5% to 30% of the asset in equity or equity related securities with medium to high risk profile. 

Of the investments in debt instruments, 82%-87% would be invested in AA rated non convertible debentures. 

The benchmark index for the scheme will be CRISIL MIP Blended Index.

 The fund managers for the scheme are Rajat Chandak equity portion, Rahul Goswami and Aditya Pagaria will jointly manage the debt portion and Abhishek Pathak for ADRs/GDRs and other foreign securities.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Principal Mutual Fund announces change in exit load

Principal Mutual Fund has announced change in exit load of Principal Debt Opportunities Fund - Corporate Bond Plan, with effect from September 22, 2014.

Accordingly, the exit load charge will be 0.50% if redeemed on or before 60 days from the date of allotment.

If redeemed after 60 days from the date of allotment, the exit load charge will be Nil.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Kotak Balance announces dividend

Kotak Balance announces dividend, the record date for dividend is September 25, 2014.

Kotak Mutual Fund has announced dividend under the dividend option & direct plan - dividend option of Kotak Balance, an open ended balanced scheme.  The record date for declaration of dividend is September 25, 2014.

The quantum of dividend on the face value of Rs 10 per unit will be Rs 0.50 per unit each.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Overdrive: 150cc motorcycle faceoff

Written By Unknown on Sabtu, 20 September 2014 | 18.00

Overdrive pit four of the latest 150cc segment commuter motorcycles - Suzuki Gixxer vs Bajaj Discover 150F vs Hero Xtreme & Yamaha FZ against each other to find out which motorcycle you should spend your money on.

Overdrive pit four of the latest 150cc segment commuter motorcycles - Suzuki Gixxer vs  Bajaj Discover 150F vs  Hero Xtreme & Yamaha FZ against each other to find out which motorcycle you should spend your money on.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

Diplomatic talks aside, China still bypasses Indian exports

Chinese premier Xi Jinping's promise to invest USD 20 billion in India was the highlight of his most-talked-about visit to the country, but the fact remains that the dragon nation is still resisting Indian imports.

Also read: India-China talks: High on hype; low on substance?

In an interview to CNBC-TV18's Latha Venkatesh, Dr Sachin Chaturvedi, Director General, RIS says China continues to bypass India. He says China is using non tariff barriers to block Indian export of agriculture products.

He says Indian pharma exports too are not being allowed and despite USFDA's clearances to the drugs, China on pretext of standards, is not allowing exports in Beijing or Shanghai.

Also read: Key trade, biz announcements during China Xi's India visit

Professor SK Mohanty says the issue also lies with the value chain. While India has competitive advantage in several lines of products like machinery, precision instruments, chemicals, in some sort of textiles, China continues to import from Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) – Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore Thailand, Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar (Burma) and Vietnam.

In the process of import from ASEAN countries, China is completely bypassing India's capabilities. "China should change its strategy to source more from India where it is more competitive than other countries so that it can benefit itself by lowering its cost of imports from other ASEAN countries and also provide greater market access to India, he adds.

Below is the transcript of Sachin Chaturvedi & SK Mohanty's interview with Latha Venkatesh on CNBC-TV18.

Q: We understand that China is now moving from slightly lower value-added industries to more hi-tech industries. It is vacating some industries. Do you think this vacating can be an area which India can take over and thereby bridge the trade deficit? What are the immediate plans that you can think of to bridge this vast trade deficit?

Chaturvedi: It is very important for us to realise that almost 42 percent of our total exports to China is coming from our natural base. So that kind of extractive profile that China has exhibited in the last couple of years from across the world is a major challenge and that India would have to evolve proactive measures in terms of promoting technology intensive exports and that requires a major push.

Q: If you can elaborate a bit more since most of us are very ignorant of what exactly are the products exported. You are saying it's largely items like iron ore which are natural resources.

Chaturvedi: Exactly. If one looks at the statistics, one will find that textile is almost 26 percent of our total exports while minerals and base metals are almost 42 percent of the total exports. So China's appetite for natural products for minerals, for iron ore and other things is huge and unfortunately, India hasn't put any kind of check on this export (a) because it is very rewarding and (b) because traders are finding it very easy to ship it to China. Sometimes we know from one of these states even unauthorised exports of iron ore have happened in the past.

Q: Would you say that the export levy on iron ore which India introduced a year ago is the way to go. As well what other strategies can India employ?

Chaturvedi: That is only one dimension of the challenge that we have to face. The second one is far more intense in terms of domestic policy proposition which is to give impetus to our manufacturing sector. As you rightly mentioned in the beginning about giving push to our technology intensive exports and there is a sort of vacuum in our export portfolio at this stage. So, it has to be addressed. We need to put our thinking hats on in terms of how we create a niche for that and as one might have noticed Dr. Mohanty has come up with a study which lays out nuances of a strategy in which we make India part of the global value chains which are bringing in India and China together. So, that is the way forward and we would have to lay out a roadmap in terms of how we can hookup at least some sectors of our manufacturing area to have a balance in terms of a hook to linkup with when it comes to high technology exports.

Q: In your paper you speak of the global value chain as well as the regional value chain. How does India fit in?

Mohanty: One can see that the global trade is moving fast in the areas of regional valuation and in this regard if one looks at the competitive position of India vis-à-vis other suppliers of products related to valuation sector, then India is better-off compared to many countries in south and south east Asian region.

The study has highlighted that in the sector, value chain particularly parts and components, India has got competitiveness in several lines of products like machinery, precision instruments, chemicals, in some sort of textiles – these are the broad sectors within the region of value chain particularly parts and components where India has got competitiveness as compared to major leading countries in south east Asian counties like Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia and Philippines.

Q: What is holding back? Is it that we are not part of an Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) or any of the regional trading blocks? Is that the reason why we are not participating in this regional value chain?

Mohanty: Difficulty is that China is consistently through bilateral Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and regional FTAs with ASEAN, sourcing much from the ASEAN region and has completely bypassed India's capabilities. China should change its strategy to source more from India where it is more competitive than other countries so that it can benefit itself by lowering its cost of imports from other ASEAN countries and also provide greater market access to India.

Q: You were telling me that India is trying to get China to accept ASEAN+6. At the moment China has preferred the group ASEAN+3 and India is not in that plus three, so they should get into ASEAN+6. Is China resisting it stubbornly or is it something which India can win over?

Chaturvedi: China's resistance for India's access to not only their own market but even to that of ASEAN is very much evident. We need to realise the agony that our pharmaceutical market is facing in terms of market access in China. So, that struggle is going on.

The issue here is that there is growth in India as they are saying; the only challenge that we have at the domestic level is to have consistency in terms of our production, production of quality and then be part of those value chains which are coming in. So, some proactive measures we require on part of our own industry and our government to see that we are part of those chains. As you know in the last couple of years and if you see the number you were right that China has invested very little right from 2000 to 2014, only something like USD 400 million but if you look at India's investment in China, it is somewhere close to USD 1 billion from 2000 to 2012. So, that very much shows that there is eagerness among Indian investor and Indian exporters to link up with Chinese market and take the measures that are important in terms of tap on these externalities which are evident from the Chinese.

Q: I agree but is there a resistance on the past of China, is China using this bypassing of India because of diplomatic reason. Is China deliberately keeping India out?

Chaturvedi: Yes, definitely because the way China is using non tariff barriers to block our export of agriculture products. If you speak to export promotion council, they would tell you how much resistance we are facing in export of agricultural products on names of sanitary and phytosanitary measures, technical barriers to trade. So, sanitary/phyto-sanitary (SPS) and technical barriers to trade (TBT) are the two agreements of WTO within which China is blocking our export of agricultural products.

You would also find resistance in terms of not allowing export of our pharmaceutical products to China. However, for the last five years, major India companies are requesting for clearance even when they have Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance to export to Untied States - China on questions or on pretext of standard, is not allowing our pharmaceutical exporters to land up in Beijing or Shanghai. So those are some of the measures and I was expecting that during this visit of the premier, the issue of mutual recognition of standards would come up and this is the way we have addressed our problems with USA, which was a sort of economy ridden with barriers.

Q: But it hasn't come up?

Chaturvedi: No, it hasn't come up at this point but I was hoping that something would be done to address this.

Q: Do you think that we need to get into the ASEAN first and then when your products are there, getting into China is easy?

Mohanty: At the outset I would like to tell that at the beginning there are two processes – ASEAN+3 and ASEAN+6 and China was insisting on ASEAN+3 because China was more consistent with countries like Japan, Korea and China. Therefore, China wanted that ASEAN+3 should start first but subsequently India and other countries strongly argued and several studies showed that there is tremendous potential in ASEAN+6, which is much better than ASEAN+3 and that is how the new grouping has come up in the name of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and India is part of RCEP and now there is no ASEAN+3.

As you rightly said that several ideas have come up and we have seen in various studies that many of them are found to be very good particularly ASEAN could be India's future.

Q: Two issues – the renminbi has remain stable compared to the dollar and definitely compared to the rupee as well over the past four-five years since the Lehman crises and India has had the advantage of huge depreciation in the last one year. Is this going to be able to bridge the deficit?

Chaturvedi: I think much more substantive issue in context of India-China relationship is this huge trade deficit to which you alluded in the beginning and that trade deficit we would have to address. However, if you pick up details on China's strategy because China is facing hit all across the world because of trade deficit. Latin American countries immediate after Fortaleza meeting of BRIC when premier went across Latin America, every country they raised this issue of trade deficit with China.

So, there the issue that China is trying to raise is to take that advantage of trade deficit to turn it into preferential investment arrangement and after coming back from Ahmedabad the premier again indicated in terms of preferential investment access in India. Therefore, the USD 20 billion proposal that has come up for investment is a very little given the huge gap we have of USD 36 billion. So that's a major challenge that we are facing and you rightly said in the beginning that with Japan we have a deficit of only USD 6 billion. With China the measures to allow market access is an issue as I said in the beginning but then to turn deficit into preferential investment to get absorbed at the local level is a strategy which is a very brilliant masterstroke from China and we would have to understand this game and would have to take it in that earnestness.


18.00 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger